![]()
Click here to read "An
introduction to the M14P for flat-engine pilots" by Fred Abramson
VEDENEYEV ENGINES
Background and
history
Under the Soviet system of aircraft design and production, Design Bureaux had the responsibility for designing aircraft/engines, which they would test until acceptance and then manufacturing would typically be given to a separate manufacturing plant.
The principal product of the
Vedeneyev Design Bureau has been the M14 family of engines, but these were
originally designed as the AI-14 by the Ivchenko Design Bureau at Zaparozhye in
the
The AI-14 was originally produced
in the late 1950s as a 260hp engine until the Soviet authorities made the
decision to pass all piston-engine development to Ivan Vedeneyev, who had set
up his own Design Bureau in
Under the Soviet system (above)
the actual manufacture of these piston engines was given to the Voronezh
Mechanical Plant (VMP) a huge State controlled organisation, also in
After the collapse of the
There was continuing large scale production of engines in the early 90s with the last completed engine being manufactured by VMP in 1994. However they still had large numbers of major components and have continued to produce small numbers of engines since then from these pre-existing components and subassemblies.
The M14 series of engines is recognised as being one of the finest aircraft engines of all times. They are:
Ø Extremely lightweight for their power.
Ø Very tough and reliable – the Russians operate generating sets in Siberian oil fields powered by M14Ps, which are expected to run for 20,000 hours before overhaul.
Ø Fully ‘inverted’ with the ability to run in any attitude.
Ø Dry-sumped, which ensures good lubrication at any attitude.
Ø Economical, despite their power - as little as 40 litres of fuel per hour at economical cruising.
Ø Currently the most powerful light aircraft engines available today – in versions up to 450hp.
Ø Beautifully made incorporating such items as roller-cam-followers and roller-rocker arms.
Under Soviet agreements, Aerostar
in
The M14P family is certainly one of the World’s legendry aircraft engines, to a certain extent because of its exceptional record in world-class aerobatic competitions, but also because of its charismatic noise and high-power output for its weight. As the only radial engine still in production, it also has a great deal of historical interest.
The Russian National Team began asking for more power and the result was the M14PF in which the power is increased to 400hp by changing the supercharger gearbox so that the supercharger is turned at 10.5 times engine speed rather than 8.25. This therefore uses the same supercharger and other systems, but turns the supercharger impeller at an extremely high 30,000 rpm in order to produce the higher levels of boost necessary for greater power.
The PF engine is now well-proven after some 15 years in service. In- service testing was done with the Russian National Team and the engine was principally used in competition aircraft, such as the Sukhoi, but now has much wider application in other Yaks. The PF is now cleared up to 500 hours TBO, with the only proviso that the normal 100 hour checks are done at 50 hour intervals.
We have now sold more than 100 ‘PF’ engines to customers all over the world and we are now fitting them to all Yaks types, both to achieve higher performance for aerobatic aircraft, but over 60% of the Yak-18Ts we sell are fitted with ‘PF’ engines to enhance take-off and climb performance.
We have found PFs to be very
reliable in practice, indeed on a statistical basis, somewhat more so than
standard M14Ps. In the
Most of the M14PF engines that we have sold have been from unused, but old-stock M14P engines, which we have bought and returned to Vedeneyev, who disassemble and convert these engines; reassemble; run on test beds and then pass to us to sell.
We have had, and indeed continue to have, a worldwide exclusive arrangement with Vedeneyev/OKBM to sell their products outside the Former Soviet Union.
At the end of 2004, it became clear
that there were serious financial problems with the company. Because of this production was reduced to
very small amounts, and the company was placed in a form of protective
bankruptcy, similar to the
However in 2006, Vedeneyev was purchased by FK System – a major Russian group with a wide variety of interests, including the control of Kamov Helicopters. They have injected considerable amounts of fresh capital; reorganised the business and in doing so changing it from a Soviet style organisation into a much more modern and competitive business.
This can be seen in much more efficient production methods; swifter turn-round for overhauls etc etc.
The Russian Air Force issued a requirement for a high-performance two-seater training aircraft powered by a piston engine, to take over from the Yak-52. Sukhoi proposed the Su-49 – a tricycle retractable and extraction-system equipped version of the Su-29. Yakovlev proposed the Yak-54M, a similar modification to the Yak-54 aerobatic aircraft. In both cases the requirement was for a 450hp engine given the greater weight of the aircraft. The potential engine requirement was going to be large and clearly of interest to both Vedeneyev/OKMB and VMP.
In 2002 we could see that there was a real market for an engine that changed a single seat Sukhoi from having a power-to-ratio of just under 1 to over 1, which could totally transform the aerobatics that were possible. We discussed this with Vedeneyev, and over a two year period, with our funding, they developed the M14R, essentially an M14P gearbox and crankcase, but with a totally re-designed supercharger and accessory case section. We had initially intended to use fuel injection, but for a variety of reasons 450hp was available with a carburettor, which meant that this was not necessary. Also it was felt that the engine would not be considered for use by the Russian Air Force if a non-Russian fuel-injection unit was used and at that stage there were no suitable Russian versions available.
We have sold a number of M14R
engines, although the first 3 engines suffered identical failures in the
bushings of the supercharger drive shafts, which were turning at much higher
speeds and under greater load. In all
cases the engine continued to run and the aircraft landed safely. However this led to a re-design of the
defective bearings, which were changed from bushings to roller bearings and
after significant amounts of testing, the engine is back in production, albeit
slowly. We are putting as much pressure on Vedeneyev as possible, since we have
considerable demand for these engines.
The capability of the M14R engine is demonstrated by the fact that
overall victor of the 2007 World Aerobatic Championships was Ramon Alonso of
VMP began looking at ways of achieving the requirements for the Sukhoi Su-49 and for political reasons a bond had already been established between VMP and Sukhoi for this engine. A major problem was that the Su-49 has hydraulic rather than pneumatic systems and therefore the engine has to have a hydraulic pump as part of its ancillaries.
Vedeneyev/OKBM had previously developed an engine called the M14B (300hp) for the Antonov A14, which had been totally re-designed to accommodate a hydraulic pump behind the supercharger. VMP decided that this engine should be the basis of their higher power engine, which they called the M9F, indicating that it is radically different from both the M14B and indeed the M14P.
Inevitably, with two design teams working towards the same goal their results have been similar, although very different in detail. The M9F is considerably modified from the M14P as can be seen by the photograph below in which the items unique to the M9F are coloured in yellow.
|
|
|
Yellow indicates
the part unique to the
M9F
Fuel Injection system
In 2003 Sukhoi decided to upgrade the Su-26M into the Su-26M3 and this aircraft was fitted with the M9F engine. This combination of engine and airframe has won every world and European Championship since then, with the exception of the recent 2007 World Aerobatic Championship where the Russian Team Su-26M3s came third, fourth and seventh, as well as winning the team prize.
Like the M14R, we have an exclusive arrangement with VMP for the supply of M9F engines, and have done all we can to get regular supplies. However VMP received, in the middle of 2007, an order for 120 new M14P engines, principally for 60 new Yak-18T aircraft for the Russian Ministry of Transport. This has meant that their energies are totally directed to this big contract and we are not sure when more M9F engines might be available. However we have sold four of them; one powered an American-owned Su-26M which won the Freestyle gold medal at the 2007 World Championships – certainly the most demanding element of the championships.
The requirement for the Su-49 was 450hp and it is intended to achieve this with the M9F with fuel injection becoming the M9FS. The Russian system which has been developed is electronic, injecting fuel into each separate intake under high pressure. It also has a mechanical reversion, so if the electronic system fails, the engine will continue to run, albeit giving less power.
I have seen the fuel injection system demonstrated showing an almost instantaneous reversion to mechanical injection, with the engine giving approximately 15% less power but clearly running perfectly well.
Starting the engine is significantly simplified with no need for a primer and what is particularly impressive is the engine’s ability to go from idle to high power settings with none of the normal hesitation.
It is intended that the fuel injection will be offered as a stand-alone alternative to the carburettor, giving enhanced power but also considerably improved economy. We are not yet sure when this will be, or of the costs.
Of course both Vedeneyev/OKBM and VMP say that their high-powered engines are better than the other! Both have been very thoroughly developed and the real difference is that the M14R has a more radical impeller and infuser design, as well as turning the impeller at higher speeds. Conversely the M9F is probably stronger in the supercharger area by virtue of larger bearings and reinforcement to take the hydraulic drive from the rear of the engine.
VMP also see a revived future introducing a range of small radial engines. The first is the M5 (5 cylinders) but a smaller engine by virtue of a shorter stroke, albeit keeping the same cylinders as the M14P. Current power is 170hp for a weight of 135kgs. The next engine is the M7 (7 cylinders) which is still under development, currently giving 270hp for a weight of 170kgs.
Given the many hundreds of aircraft, both of original Russian design but also new types utilizing the M14 family of engines, the future of engine and component supplies is critical. The order for 120 new engines from VMP is clearly a major step in securing future supplies of spares, and a further positive note is that Vedeneyev have established their own foundry and large machine shop in order to produce all major components themselves, rather than be dependant on components from VMP as they have done historically.
With this procedure we sell the entire rear of the engine – that is everything behind the crank case including all of the ‘PF’ conversion kit built into the supercharger and all ancillary drives.
This conversion is a straight ‘bolt-on’ conversion, although the engine needs to be removed from the aircraft and all accessories (magnetos, carburettor, oil pump etc) need to be changed. Finally the carburettor needs to be readjusted to cope with the different mixture requirements of the PF.
We offer this conversion at Euro 4,000 on an exchange basis for the old unit.
The original M14P has output shaft with radial splines to mate with corresponding splines on the Russian V-530 propeller. Most PF engines have been intended for use with the German MTV-3 and MTV-9 propellers and so have been delivered with American SAE flanges. However, MT now makes propellers with both Russian and Western flanges, so effectively these are interchangeable.
We can supply exchange gearboxes incorporating either flange for Euro 2,500 on an exchange basis.
We have seen engine prices go from approximately US$8,000 up to current figures which are far higher as the large number of engines that had been available from Russian flying clubs and DOSAAF airfields have been used. Prices are still rather less than Western engines, but our view is that these prices will continue to increase. Currently the prices that we have to pay for engines and components have become dramatically greater over the last 18 months or so. Our prices are subject to change without notice, but are currently:
Ø Factory zero-time M14P (360hp) Euro 18,500
Ø Factory new engines (ie unused but old stock) 360hp Euro 23,500 – but we have not had any to sell for over one year.
Ø Factory zero-timed M14PF (400hp) Euro 23,500
Ø Factory new M14PF (400hp) Euro 31,000 (when available but see below)
Ø Factory new M14R and M9F engines Euro 44,000
You should note that the zero-time engines:
These prices are FCA White Waltham, UK. Please contact us for current availability.
We have established an exclusive arrangement with Aerometal Kft
in Hungary, to overhaul engines of the AI14, and M14P families.
Aerometal are the oldest established company in Europe doing
this work, which they do to an exceptionally high standard. In addition:
Ø They are fully
certificated to EASA 145 standard.
Ø They have large
reserves of factory spare parts, which are becoming a critical problem for
others trying to do this work.
Ø All engines are
properly dynamometer tested before delivery, not just run on an old airframe.
Ø We have exclusivity with Barrett Precision Engines for
Europe to install their new-technology pistons in our overhauls. These are a
huge advance on the old Russian pistons, in that the piston material expands at
a far slower rate than original, so can be made to fit with less than half the
cold clearance. This leads to oil consumption of less than one litre per hour;
oil remains clean due to little "blow-by"; cylinder temperatures
remain about 20 degrees less; about 15/20 more horse-power, through increased
compression.
Ø We have European
exclusivity for the installation of the superb automotive plug conversions, and
have EASA and CAA approval for this for all aircraft with these engines.
Ø We place
considerable emphasis on the cosmetic appearance of engines, and for a small
supplement they can be painted in any colour.
Ø We can install the
light-weight B&C alternators during overhaul.
Ø Current turn-round
time for overhaul is 6 weeks.
Please contact us for any more information; current pricing and
timing for overhauls.
The Russian V-530 propeller cannot transmit more than 370/380hp, and if an engine with greater power is installed, then one should go to the MTV-9-250/260 prop. The following important points should be noted:
Ø The standard ‘Lycoming’ 6-bolt flange is at the limits of
reliability with 400hp and unlimited level aerobatics.
Ø The Russian flange is safe in excess of 500hp since the
bolts are larger and the radial splines provide better location for the hub on
the flange.
Ø MTV-9 propellers are made with either Russian or Western
flanges at the same price, as are the 250 or 260 blades.
Ø The standard propeller blade profile is called the –27. We were looking for propellers for the M14R,
and did not want to exceed 260cm for reasons of ground clearance on a normal
Sukhoi and therefore asked MT if they could provide a propeller capable of
transmitting more power but with no increase in diameter. The result has been the –29 wide chord blade,
which will transmit 450hp at 260cm diameter.
Ø In practice we have established that the –29 blade gives
significantly enhanced performance over the –27 blade even with 360-hp. Depending on the performance parameter, this
ranges from +2% to +13%.
Ø Finally, in terms of choices, MT offers a standard and also
a ‘large’ spinner for this propeller.
Ø (We have
a separate information sheet on MTV propellers for Sukhoi and Yak aircraft).
We warranty all the engines that we sell on the following basis:
Ø New engines are warranted for one year or one hundred hours from the date of installation.
Ø Overhauled engines are warranted for six months or fifty hours from the date of installation.
Ø The installation of an engine must occur within three years of delivery.
Ø The warranty applies to the original purchaser of the engine and is not transferable without our formal agreement.
We will, however, consider problems that occur outside these formal warranty periods.
The warranty is restricted to replacement of the failed component or subassembly, or even engine if relevant, but not for any costs of actual replacement or any consequential losses – (i.e. cost of hiring other aircraft etc).
Automotive Plug Conversion
We have now obtained full authorisation from both EASA and the UK CAA to install this conversion on all Yak and Sukhoi aircraft