The Manufacture & Future of M14P Family of Engines in Russia

The future of these engines is of critical importance, with some 500 Russian light-aircraft operating in the West, as well as (possibly) 200 homebuilt aircraft using or intending to use these engines. 

Background

Under the Soviet system of aircraft design and production, Design Bureaux had the responsibility for designing aircraft/engines, which they would test until acceptance, and then manufacturing would typically be given to a separate manufacturing plant.

In the case of the M14 series of engines, the basic design came from the Ivchenko Design Bureau, and then was adopted by the Vedeneyev/OKBM Design Bureau in Voronezh, Russia.  Vedeneyev/OKBM developed the engine to a 300-hp and then, with the M14P the 360-hp.  The manufacturing of these engines was given to the Voronezh Machine Plant, a large factory in the same city engaged in a wide variety of aerospace work. 

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the lavish funding which both organisations had previously received, stopped, as did the requirement for very large numbers of engines.  This made little difference to the Machine Plant, for whom engine production was a small activity, but had much more effect on Vedeneyev/OKBM, although they also had a larger business in aircraft and helicopter gearboxes.

The result was that the Machine Plant effectively stopped production, although they continued to assemble engines at a small rate from previously manufactured parts, and do some overhauls.  Vedeneyev/OKBM built up a much larger overhaul centre, and also went into manufacture of the 400-hp M14PF engine.  Typically this was done through the modification of old stock but never used M14P engines, which were disassembled; converted to PF specification; reassembled; tested and issued with new paperwork as new engines, which indeed they were.

The Air Force Requirement for 450hp

The Russian Air Force issued a requirement for a high performance two-seat training aircraft powered by a piston engine.  Sukhoi proposed the Su-49; a tricycle, retractable, extraction-system equipped version of the Su-29.  Yakovlev proposed the Yak-54M, a similar modification to the Yak-54.  In both cases the requirement was for 450-hp engines given the much greater weight of the aircraft.  The potential engine requirement was going to be large, and clearly of interest to both Vedeneyev/OKBM and the Voronezh Machine Plant. 

The Requirement in Sport Aircraft

In 2001 we could see that there was a real market for an engine that changed a single-seat Sukhoi from having a power-to-weight ratio of just under one to over one, which could totally transform the aerobatics that were possible.  We discussed this with Vedeneyev/OKBM, who over a 2-year period developed the M14R, whose output is 450-hp.  The changes to the engine are a totally new supercharger impeller and diffuser, and indeed a different supercharger in its entirety.  It had been intended to use fuel-injection, but for a variety of reasons – principally the fact that 450-hp was available with a carburettor meant that this was not necessary.  Four M14R engines have been delivered, and one in a UK based Su-26 has now done some 160-hours, mainly hard aerobatics, running at 103% and seemingly perfect. 

The Financial Position

It became clear in May 2004 that there were serious financial problems with Vedeneyev/OKBM.  At first it seemed that the amounts owed by the organisation were relatively small, but it has become clear that this amount runs into several millions of dollars.  Because of this production effectively ground to a halt, while the organisation was in the Russian equivalent of “Chapter 11.”

Fortunately (for engine production anyway) Vedeneyev/OKBM also have a significant business in the manufacture and overhaul of helicopter gearboxes.  These are mainly used in Kamov helicopters, which are currently selling well throughout the world.  Kamov inevitably became concerned about their ability to manufacture, and subsequently to service helicopters, and made an application to the Voronezh court (who are the official Administrators for Vedeneyev/OKBM), with an interest to purchase the organisation. 

We ourselves have been a significant creditor of the organisation, and have worked with Kamov to ensure this end.  It would seem that Kamov’s bid has been accepted, and that Vedeneyev/OKBM will be sold  to Kamov.  Kamov have assured us that this will result in the continued production of the M14 series of engines.

The M9F

The Machine Plant began looking at ways of achieving the requirements for the Su-49, and for political reasons a bond had already been established between the Machine Plant and Sukhoi for this engine.  A major problem however was that the Su-49 has hydraulic rather than pneumatic systems, and therefore the engine had to have a heavy-duty hydraulic pump as part of its ancillaries. 

Vedeneyev/OKBM had previously developed an engine called the M14B (300-hp) for the Antonov 14, which had been redesigned to accommodate a hydraulic pump behind the supercharger.  The Machine Plant decided it was an easier exercise to begin with this engine and extract more power, than attempting to add a hydraulic system onto an M14P.

The new engine of the VMP is called the M9F, and is effectively an M14B with a “P” gearbox; “P” cylinders and the higher compression ratio of the “P.”

The increased power of the M9F (430-hp) has been achieved, like the M14R by a redesign of the supercharger.  However the superchargers are somewhat different (having been separately designed), and in the “R” it turns faster, hence slightly greater power output of 450-hp.

(The designation was changed to “9” to avoid any legal/political problems with Vedeneyev/OKBM, whom, it would seem, have rights over the “14” series).   In 2003 Sukhoi decided to upgrade the Su-26M into the Su-26M3, and this aircraft was fitted with the M9F engine, and performed very impressively at the Florida World Championship and the Lithuanian European Championship. However only four engines have been built to date, and at a nominal price of US$42,000 in Russia.

The requirement for the Su-49 was for 450-hp, and it is intended to achieve this with the M9F with fuel-injection, becoming the M9FS.   A Russian system has been developed, which is electronic, injecting fuel into each separate intake pipe under high pressure.  Interestingly, it has a mechanical reversion, so if the electronic system fails, the engine will continue to run, albeit giving less power under a mechanical fuel-injection system.

I have seen this demonstrated, with an engine at maximum continuous power having the electronic system cut, and the restoration of power was well under 1-second, with the engine giving approximately 15% less power, but clearly running perfectly satisfactorily.

In addition, starting the engine is significantly simplified, with no need for a primer, and the engine is primed by the electric fuel pump alone.  What is particularly impressive is the engine’s ability to go from very low power setting, or even idle, to high-power settings, with none of the normal “hesitation.”

A further advantage claimed (but I was not able to confirm this) is that cylinder temperatures are reduced  by virtue of better and more even combustion.

In the photograph below  the system can be seen in detail, showing the main fuel-injection unit and the individual injectors.  Also the electric fuel-pump can be seen.  

                                             

  M9F fuel control unit; electrical & mechanical fuel pumps          M9FS fuel injector mounted on intake pipe    

The fuel-injection system is will be offered as a “stand-alone” alternative to the carburettor.  The advantages will be those listed above, but also considerably enhanced economy.  Clearly much will depend on the price of a kit, and this is currently being established.

There now seems unlikely to be a Russian Air Force order for the Su-49, and that the Air Force will make do with updated versions of the Yak-52.  Because of this the Voronezh Machine Plant have obtained the permission of Sukhoi to sell the engine, subject to a royalty payment to Sukhoi who of course funded the engine’s development.

Of particular importance is that the M9F will be fully Type-Certificated (as indeed the M14P already is). 

A further interesting development is that of electronic ignition.  I saw prototype electronic ignition systems, based on existing magnetos, but much smaller lighter and systems are under development.  Whether these would be sold with one electronic system and one magneto system, is as yet unsure.  

                              

                   M9F rear accessory case                                            M9F on test stand                      

The Position of Vedeneyev/OKBM Today

The organisation is still producing engines from “old stock” but unused engines, but although in a very limited way, but fresh funding and cancellation of all existing debts by Kamov is expected soon, and they say that this will enable them to continue as before. 

However they are likely to continue to work with “old stock” but unused engines, and the supply of these is certainly becoming much much more difficult.  (People have historically had the idea that there are many hundreds of such engines waiting around in Russia for buyers, but the simple fact is that the numbers are now increasingly small).  The direct results of this are that engine prices will undoubtedly increase in the future.

The Voronezh Machine Plant Today

 

The Voronezh Machine Plant is a substantial organisation, still employing about 8,000-people engaged in a variety of production.  It makes the “Buran” Russian Space Shuttle as well as the big Proton rockets that are used for space flight.  In addition, it has a very profitable business (given the healthy state of the Russian oil industry) of oil and gas equipment.

The organisation continues to be 100% state owned, but is surprisingly entrepreneurial in its approach, and it does seem that they are committed to the piston engine and to the M14P and its derivatives. 

They are committed to the idea of total manufacture of engines, rather than assembly from old-produced parts.  I saw at least 600 brand-new cylinders; a dozen or so crankcases, crankshafts.  They confirm that all jigs and tooling etc have been kept, so it is only a question of funding and timing to re-establish production.  (As opposed to Sukhoi who destroyed all Su-26 jigs and tooling).  In addition, they are going to bring in-house manufacture of “bought in” assemblies such as carburettors, magnetos and governors.

M14R v M9F

Of course both organisations say that their 450-hp engine is better than the other.  Certainly both have been very thorough in the way that the engines have been developed, and the real differences are that the M14R would seem to have a more radical impeller and diffuser design, as well as turning the impeller at higher speeds.  We have seen manifold pressures of 1,160mm of mercury on production M14Rs, indicating the efficiency of the supercharger.

Conversely, the M9F is probably stronger in the supercharger area, by virtue of larger bearings and reinforcement to take the hydraulic drive from the rear of the engine.  Its power is obviously achieved through better fuel mixtures, and also better fuel atomisation as it enters the cylinders.  M9F is operating at lower boost – it is expected that 450-hp will be obtained at approximately 1,090mm of mercury. 

Other Products of the Voronezh Machine Plant

MP also see a revived future in producing a range of small radial engines.  The first one is the M5 (of course 5-cylinders), but a smaller engine by virtue of a shorter stroke, albeit keeping the same cylinders.  One engine has done approximately 250-hours of static tests, and flown for some 70-hours in a Yak-12.  Current power output is 170-hp for a weight of 135-kilos (approximately 295lbs).  It would seem likely that this engine will be available for home-builders, and should have a wide application.

The next is the M7 (7-cylinders), which has run, but only for some 10-hours or so on a test-bed.  It is currently giving 270-hp, for a weight of 170-kilos – 370lbs.  

                                           

              M7 prototype              Impellers - M9F left - M14P right                    M5 crankshaft assembly

The Future

There are clearly many aircraft, both in the East and the West, dependent on engines produced in Voronezh.  Engines are still being produced by Aeromotors in Romania, and I am sure that the more sources of supply there are, the better for consumers.

I think however, many had thought that the Voronezh industry had completely stopped, and would never make major new components, or indeed totally new engines.  I believe that this will happen, and indeed have seen much of it already beginning to happen.  Certainly Vedeneyev/OKBM has had its problems, but seems to have a solution.  VMP would appear to have the commitment, and certainly have the financial muscle to ensure a long-term presence, and I believe that this will happen.  

              

             New Cylinders                                    New gearbox & rear housings

Pricing and Deliveries

We will publish these as soon as they are available.  However, we currently stock new and zero-timed M14P (360-hp) and M14PF (400-hp).  These have list prices as follows:

  • Factory zero-timed M14P (360hp) engines Euro 16,500

  • Factory brand-new engines  M14P (360hp) (but typically of 1991 – 1994 manufacture) Euro 21,500

  • Factory zero-timed M14PF (400hp) engines Euro 21,500

  • Factory-new M14PF (400hp) engines Euro 28,000

Propellers for outputs in excess of 400hp

The Russian V-530 propeller cannot transmit more than 370/380hp, and if an engine with greater power is installed, then one should go to the MTV-9-250/260 prop.  The following important points should be noted:

  • The standard ‘Lycoming’ 6-bolt flange is at the limits of reliability with 400hp and unlimited level aerobatics.

  • The Russian flange is safe in excess of 500hp since the bolts are larger and the radial splines provide better location for the hub on the flange.

  • The standard propeller blade profile is called the –27.  When looking at propellers for the M14R, we did not want to exceed 260cm for reasons of ground clearance on a normal Sukhoi and therefore asked MT if they could provide a propeller capable of transmitting more power but with no increase in diameter.  The result has been the –29 wide chord blade, which will transmit 450hp at 260cm diameter. 

  •  We have found however that the –29 blade seems to give increased performance even with lower horsepower over –27.

  •  Finally, in terms of choices, MT offer a standard and also a ‘large’ spinner for this propeller.

Do call or email for any specific queries: tel:  +44 (0) 1544 340120  Email: richard.goode@russianaeros.com